Net Neutrality Rules: FCC to Vote on April 25 for Broadband Regulation

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is gearing up to vote on reinstating net neutrality rules and expanding regulatory oversight of broadband internet, a move that signals a significant policy shift from the previous administration, Reuters news report said.
US FCC Chair Jessica RosenworcelThe FCC disclosed its intention to hold a vote on the final rule during its meeting scheduled for April 25, as conveyed to advocates on Tuesday. This decision comes in the wake of a 3-2 vote by the commission in October to reinstate open internet rules established in 2015 and to reaffirm the FCC’s authority over broadband internet.

Net neutrality, a fundamental principle ensuring that internet service providers treat all online content and applications equally, without preference or discrimination, lies at the core of this regulatory initiative.

FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel emphasized the role of broadband internet, particularly underscored by the COVID-19 pandemic, stating, “The pandemic made clear that broadband is an essential service, that every one of us – no matter who we are or where we live – needs it to have a fair shot at success in the digital age,” Jessica Rosenworcel told Reuters.

Jessica Rosenworcel emphasized that reinstating net neutrality rules, which had been previously court-approved, aims to ensure that broadband access remains fast, open, and fair, aligning with President Joe Biden’s directive in a July 2021 executive order to restore net neutrality regulations enacted during the Barack Obama administration.

Democrats, who have championed the reinstatement of these rules, faced obstacles during the previous administration due to the FCC’s composition. Under the Donald Trump administration, the FCC contended that net neutrality rules were unnecessary and stifled innovation, a stance disputed by Democrats.

The proposed reinstatement of net neutrality rules is also seen as a national security measure, with Rosenworcel noting that it would provide the FCC with enhanced tools to address concerns related to equipment and services from Chinese companies like Huawei and ZTE.

However, not all FCC commissioners are in favor of this move. Republican FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr opposes the plan, arguing that broadband speeds have increased, prices have decreased, and competition has intensified since the repeal of net neutrality rules in 2017.

Despite the repeal at the federal level, several states have enacted their own net neutrality laws or regulations. Industry groups have also ceased legal challenges to these state requirements, signaling a growing acceptance of net neutrality principles within the regulatory landscape.


Net neutrality rules in the United States have been a subject of intense debate and have significant implications for businesses, particularly those operating in the telecommunications and internet sectors. Net neutrality is the principle that all internet traffic should be treated equally, without discrimination or favoritism by internet service providers (ISPs). The implementation or repeal of net neutrality rules can have various impacts on businesses:

Level Playing Field: Net neutrality rules ensure that all businesses, regardless of size or financial resources, have equal access to consumers online. This fosters competition and innovation by allowing startups and smaller businesses to compete with larger, more established companies on a level playing field.

Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Without net neutrality, ISPs could potentially prioritize certain types of internet traffic or offer fast lanes for companies willing to pay extra. This could stifle innovation by making it more difficult for new ideas and startups to gain traction online, as they may not have the resources to pay for preferential treatment.

Consumer Choice and Freedom: Net neutrality ensures that consumers have the freedom to access the content and services of their choice without interference from ISPs. Repealing net neutrality rules could lead to ISPs limiting access to certain websites or services, potentially influencing consumer behavior and restricting choice.

Costs for Businesses: If ISPs were to implement tiered pricing or charge companies for preferential treatment, it could significantly increase costs for businesses that rely on the internet for their operations. This could particularly affect businesses that rely heavily on bandwidth-intensive services or streaming content.

Innovation in Online Services: Net neutrality rules have historically encouraged the development of new online services and platforms by ensuring they have equal access to consumers. Without these rules, there may be less incentive for companies to invest in developing innovative online services if they face barriers to reaching their target audience.

Investment in Infrastructure: Proponents of repealing net neutrality argue that it could incentivize ISPs to invest in expanding and improving broadband infrastructure. They suggest that allowing ISPs to charge for preferential treatment could provide them with additional revenue to invest in upgrading networks. However, critics argue that without net neutrality, ISPs may have less incentive to invest in infrastructure because they could potentially generate revenue by charging for fast lanes instead.

Baburajan Kizhakedath