The bench, however, made a distinction for unsolicited
commercial calls and said that the restriction imposed by the TRAI on them was
valid.
We have already pointed out that the TRAI has found that
UCC calls and SMSs were interfering with the personal lives of the individuals
as often telemarketers would call them up for selling their products. All such
calls sere unsolicited, i.e., the receiving party does not want to receive such
calls or messages. These UCC messages disturb the recipients, intrude into
their privacy, and impose a cost in terms of the time and efforts. In fact,
they infringe the equally importance rights of the unwilling recipients,” it
said.
Partly allowing the petition of Anil Kumar, secretary of
NGO Telecom Watchdog, the court, however, granted liberty to TRAI to come out
with more appropriate regulations for regulating unsolicited non-UCCs SMSs that
could meet the test of reasonableness under the Constitution. With inputs from PTI